Sent via email to:
Mr Jordann Turner
jordann.turner@lacity.org
Mr Turner,
I’m writing to voice my concerns regarding the City of Los Angeles’ inclusion of a very large contingency of active mountain bicyclists in and around the Los Angeles metropolitan area. As a mountain bicyclist for over 15 years I feel very qualified to state that in my many thousands of miles logged on trails across the United States it is possible for mountain bicyclists and equestrians to coexist without issue. Indeed, it is the exception (as much of life) where a mountain bicyclist and equestrian have an incident beyond a mutual respect and appreciation for each’s hobby.
In reading the recent comments from equestrians submitted to the city, I have to claim surprise–even shock–at the generalization that somehow mountain cyclists are incapable of coexisting with other trail users. Nothing can be further from the truth. I implore the city to take the following in consideration:
1. Somewhere in L.A. City Parks there should be opportunities for mountain bicyclists — it’s bad public policy that all dirt roads and trails are closed to bikes.
2. Bicycling is a positive, safe, health-promoting activity for people of all ages and should be encouraged with both natural-surface and paved riding opportunities.
3. The 2009 plan should incorporate the 1996 bicycle plan language that called for pilot projects and a gradual increase in mountain bike opportunities in the parks.
4. Bicyclists safely share trails with other trail users, including equestrians, all around the globe.
5. Mountain biking is a sustainable, manageable appropriate activity for L.A. parks — it works in dozens of other cities so why not ours?
6. Mountain bicyclists generate a sizable income for the city in the form of taxes on services rendered by local businesses.
7. Mountain bicyclists perform many, many hours of volunteer trail work every year at a time when many of our parks and recreational areas are falling into disrepair due to a lack of dedicated funding for maintenance.
I understand and respect the need to keep certain controls over the safe use of our limited trail systems. This is a mutual desire of all parties. However, complete exclusion of such a large contingency strikes me as rash, without regard for a significant and vocal constituency in the city and bad for Los Angeles business owners. Surely a compromise can be offered and embraced by all interested parties. Right?
Respectfully,
Brian De Groodt
IMBA Member
GT Bicycles Dirt Coalition Rider
www.degroodt.com